Next week I have an appointment with my doctor. I want to talk about removing my rectal stump. I wonder if someone has advice about good questions I could ask or things I should keep in mind when deciding about the surgery.
The surgery would 'only' be for the rectal stump and a bit of leftover surrounding tissue. Since I started irrigating my rectal stump, it doesn't cause any physical problems anymore; it's just a bit annoying. The main reason I want to think about the surgery is a bit more complicated.
Almost three years ago, I was diagnosed with rectal cancer. I initially underwent endoscopic tumor removal (EID), but due to pathological risk factors (LVI, small resection margin), I needed additional surgery to resect the rectum. I was scheduled for an APR. When I woke up, the surgeon told me he had left a rectal stump in place because there was more space than expected. This didn't feel right. As I now know (after I eventually went to another hospital), it was a mistake: the endoscopic scar is still in the rectal stump, so the tumor bed wasn't removed. (Of course, most of the tissue around the rectum was removed, including one positive lymph node. And the tumor itself was already out.)
My new hospital recommended intensifying the follow-up with more MRI scans, but they advised against removing the rectal stump because most (local) recurrences occur in the first few years. I'm already in my third year, and of course, the risk decreases over time. The doctor said that the risk reduction from removing the rectal stump is small and does not outweigh the risks of major surgery.
I'm not convinced about this. I spoke to another doctor (not my current doctor), and he told me that the surgery might not be too bad because I already had the colostomy surgery. He said the part of APR surgery that carries the most risks for nerve damage, especially for women, was mostly done three years ago, so I shouldn't be too worried about that risk now. Then I started to Google things and found and joined MaO. I've read varying outcomes of this kind of surgery on the forum: mostly difficult healing and pain when sitting. Not only after the surgery, but I read it can last for a very long time. Currently, I am fit; I have no pains or any other side effects from the first surgery (except, of course, a colostoma). On one hand, I want to keep it that way. And no recurrence at 2.5 years after the surgery is reassuring. On the other hand, it doesn't feel safe to just leave it like this. So I find it difficult. I appreciate any thoughts about pros and cons and things to consider.


