About 9 months ago, I had surgery which successfully removed cancerous tissue from my colon/rectum. This left my colon temporarily disconnected, and I had a 'temporary' ileostomy with a view to future reversal.
Having recently completed 5 months of chemotherapy, I have had a CT scan and various blood tests, all of which have come back as normal.
As a precaution, my surgeon referred me for a full colonoscopy. I had this performed a couple of days ago, and a small lump was found in the transverse colon, and biopsies were taken for testing. I was taken completely by surprise and was worried enough to contact my surgeon even before I had the test results.
To cut a long story short, he told me that if the tests proved cancerous, then the only option would be to remove the ENTIRE COLON!!
I was so gob-smacked I was speechless! How can a small lump result in this? Why not perform a resection, as I'd had previously, to remove the lump and reconnect the healthy tissue?
It seems a bit drastic to even suggest this course of action for such a small lump (apparently too small to be detected by a CT scan). It has left me wondering about the competence of the surgeon, and I fear for the future. I pray the tests come back as benign. Any comments that may enlighten me would be much appreciated.