Topic Explanation:

The discussion centers around the perception that Hollister ostomy barriers, specifically the Hollister 14602, have become thinner over the past year or two. The original poster, who has used these barriers for about eight years, notes a decrease in durability, leading to more frequent changes. They suspect this change might be part of a broader trend of product shrinkflation and seek confirmation from others who might have experienced similar issues.

Advice and Insights:

1. Experience with Thinner Barriers:
- Several users have noticed that Hollister barriers have become thinner, leading to more frequent changes.
- Some users have contacted Hollister to express concerns about the perceived reduction in quality.

2. Comparison with Other Brands:
- Some users prefer thinner barrier rings, like those from Salts, for their flexibility, especially for ileostomies.
- Coloplast wafers are noted to be thinner and more flexible, which some users find beneficial for better adhesion, especially around hernias.

3. Impact of Thinner Barriers:
- Thinner barriers may not be suitable for ileostomies due to the caustic nature of the output, which can break down the wafer material quickly.
- Users with colostomies may not notice a significant difference in wear time with thinner barriers.

4. Alternative Solutions:
- Some users suggest trying other brands like Convatec, which offers products specifically designed for ileostomies.
- Using barrier rings, such as Salts aloe, can increase wear time by strengthening the seal and providing additional protection.

5. Quality and Manufacturing Concerns:
- There is a perception that the reduction in barrier thickness is a cost-cutting measure rather than a design improvement.
- Manufacturing challenges, such as supply chain variability and rising costs of materials, may impact product quality.

6. Personal Experiences:
- Some users have switched from Coloplast to Hollister for better flexibility and wear time.
- Others have found that certain Hollister products, like the 'soft convex' wafers, offer better flexibility and adherence.

7. General Sentiment:
- There is a shared frustration about the perceived decline in product quality and the impact on users' experiences.