For The Anti Anti-Vaxers
My point here is not to argue a point. It is to ask you to do due diligence in researching some of the facts that the Anti-Vaxers have found to be true. I'm not going to give you the answers. You find out and someone give what they have looked up. Not guessed.
What are Japan, Brazil and India handling Covid-19? With what drug? Effective? Other Countries using it?
USA. How many people have died from the Vaccine in the US? (Within two weeks of taking)
How many people have become disabled after taking the vaccine?
How many miscarriages have been attributed to the vaccine?
What percent of the Covid-19 hospital patients are vaccinated?
Let's together try to answer these questions and perhaps,if you participate and not just pontificate, your question might elicit a response (fact based--No opinions--let facts speak for themselves).
I have my sources but they may be as reliable as Don Lemon of CNN.
I applaud your effort to try to inject sanity into an insane topic, but the problem with what you suggest is two-fold. First is where to get credible information to answer your questions? The sources are numerous, and often not in agreement and the date of each article written needs to be taken into consideration. Also, the credibility of the source needs to be taken into account, but rarely is, or cannot be agreed to. That issue alone makes what you're suggesting almost impossible. Unless we all agreed on which credible sources of information were to be used. And that, my friend, isn't going to happen anytime soon, for obvious reasons.
Second, you're attempting to make people do actual research, rather than regurgitating talking points, which many simply don't know how to do. Which is exactly why talking points have become so popular......they reduce one's workload if you're willing to accept them as true. Which is why they are repeated over and over and over, in unison across many sources......because they know people would rather someone else do the legwork involved in finding the truth (however truthful that result actually is). And once someone believes the sources they rely on for any such info.........you won't be able to convince them to do their own research ..they simply don't see the need.
Plainly put......there needs to be a certain amount of both 'open mindedness' and 'skepticism' regarding information provided to us that simply doesn't exist in today's world, on either side of any issue. And to suggest to many that their sources either have an agenda or don't have their best interests in mind will be viewed as heresy, plain and simple. So......while I like where you're going with this post...... until those barriers I just spoke of are overcome......what you suggest simply won't happen en masse, anytime soon. Which is an obvious shame. And it's the reason we are where we are as a society. But again, great post. Really.
Regards,
bob